INSIGHTS / WATER WELLNESS / SCIENCE

What Does the Science Actually Say About Kangen Water?

Explore the Enagic-sponsored cell experiments and 13-person exercise pilot study: what researchers observed, how they tested it and what further research could help us understand.

Share
WhatsAppFacebookLinkedInX

A glass of water beside laboratory equipment, illustrating Kangen Water research
An illustrated guide to three studies: what was tested, what was observed and how to read the findings.

WHAT THIS MEANS FOR YOU

What did the researchers observe?

This Enagic-sponsored report brings together cell experiments and a pilot study with 13 healthy adult men. Here are its main observations in plain language, before we look at how the studies were done.

HOW PEOPLE FELT

Less soreness and a better sense of recovery

In the small exercise study, the report describes reduced soreness, better self-reported recovery, and improvements in energy and overall wellbeing after drinking alkaline ionized water compared with tap water.

WHAT BLOOD TESTS SHOWED

Changes that may help explain those experiences

The report recorded statistically significant changes in some red-blood-cell measures and lower counts of some inflammatory cells. The author interpreted these as encouraging signs related to oxygen carrying and exercise recovery.

WHAT CELL TESTS ADDED

Early clues about antioxidant activity and cell function

Laboratory tests found mild, reproducible antioxidant activity, fewer free radicals released by inflammatory cells, and increased metabolism in one cell type under specific conditions. These findings provide a starting point for studying how the water interacts with cells.

The value of this report, in plain language

It offers preliminary evidence that this water may affect more than its pH reading: researchers recorded changes in cells, blood measurements and how participants felt after exercise. These observations give researchers specific questions to explore about drinking water and recovery.

Based on H. S. Filtzer’s 2017 Enagic-sponsored report, especially printed pages 10–16. Plain-language summary of the report.

PRIMARY SOURCE

Where this research comes from

The primary source is a 2017 report prepared by H. S. Filtzer, MD, FACS, Medical Advisor to Enagic USA. The report brings together Enagic-sponsored laboratory work by NIS Labs, a 13-person exercise pilot study and a later discussion of stored-sample cytokine and SOD analysis.

Dr. Filtzer set out to explore measurable biological responses. This article follows that journey from laboratory testing to exercise and recovery in human volunteers.

Cover of the scientific report by H. S. Filtzer
H. S. Filtzer, MD, FACS · 2017

WHY STUDY THE WATER?

From a glass of water to a measurable response

The researchers moved from measuring the water’s pH and ORP to testing responses in cells and human volunteers. Each stage asked a different question.

STEP 1

Study the water

Measure pH, ORP and dissolved components.

STEP 2

Observe cells

Test antioxidant activity, immune-cell responses and metabolism.

STEP 3

Compare human responses

Compare exercise and recovery under two drinking conditions.

Illustrations of the research stages, not photographs of the actual study.

THREE STUDIES, ONE RESEARCH JOURNEY

What did each study test?

IN VITRO

STUDY 119-001

Antioxidant capacity and inflammatory-cell response

Human cell cultures were used to test direct antioxidant capacity, cellular protection and free-radical production by inflammatory cells. The report found mild but reproducible direct antioxidant capacity. It did not find cellular protection above tap water under the strong stress protocol used.

IN VITRO

STUDY 119-002

Cell viability and mitochondrial metabolism

Short-lived PMN cells and longer-lived PBMC cells were studied under different glucose conditions. A dose-related increase in PMN metabolic activity appeared after four hours in the higher-glucose medium. The same result was not seen across PBMC cells or every condition.

HUMAN PILOT STUDY

STUDY 119-004

Exercise stress and recovery

Thirteen healthy adult men took part in a randomized, controlled crossover study. After periods drinking alkaline ionized water or tap water, participants completed a high-intensity exercise challenge. Researchers measured blood-cell counts, lactate and reported wellbeing.

TERMS WITHOUT THE JARGON

Four ideas that make the research easier to read

Oxidation

A chemical process involving electron loss. In biology, excessive reactive oxygen species can damage cellular components.

Antioxidant

A substance or system that can limit certain oxidative reactions.

Neutrophils and PMN cells

Short-lived immune cells that can respond quickly and release reactive molecules during inflammation.

PBMC cells

A mixed group of longer-lived blood immune cells, including lymphocytes and monocytes.

WHAT THE LABORATORY OBSERVED

What the cell experiments found

119-001 · IN VITRO

Antioxidant activity

The direct antioxidant result was modest. The report described it as “mild, but real and reproducible.” Reproducibility matters because a result that appears again under the same procedure is more useful than a one-off observation. The separate cellular-protection assay did not outperform tap water under the strong free-radical stress protocol.

119-001 · IN VITRO

Inflammatory response

Inflammatory cells exposed to alkaline ionized water produced fewer free radicals in this laboratory model. Inflammation itself is a normal protective process.

Illustrated cutaway of a mitochondrion with its folded inner membrane
Nutrients
Mitochondria
ATPUsable cell energy
A simplified guide to the normal role of mitochondria in cells.

THE CELLULAR ENGINE

Mitochondria turn fuel into usable cellular energy

Study 119-002 measured how actively cultured cells carried out metabolic processes. In four-hour PMN cultures using the higher-glucose medium, metabolic activity increased with dose. Four-hour PBMC cultures showed no effect. In 24-hour PBMC cultures, both alkaline ionized water and tap water slightly reduced viability or metabolism in the lower-to-moderate glucose medium.

FROM CELLS TO HUMAN VOLUNTEERS

How the 13-person crossover study worked

In a crossover design, the same participants experience different study conditions at separate times. Each person can therefore serve as his own comparison.

Illustrative photograph of an adult performing a bodyweight squat
WHO TOOK PART?

13 healthy adult men

Everyone tried both drinking conditions. The order was randomized, so each participant could be compared with himself.

Illustrative photograph, not an actual study participant.

Two orders. The same comparison.

Each drinking period lasted one week before the exercise test.

Order A
FIRST PERIODTap water
SECOND PERIODAlkaline ionized water
Order B
FIRST PERIODAlkaline ionized water
SECOND PERIODTap water

The report does not specify the number in each starting order or a washout period.

The same exercise test after each period

Repeat this sequence for 5 rounds.

  1. Push-ups20 seconds, then rest 20 seconds
  2. Sit-ups20 seconds, then rest 20 seconds
  3. Air squats20 seconds, then rest 20 seconds

What did the researchers compare?

Blood samples

Blood-cell counts were the main outcome. Plasma lactate was a secondary measure.

Exercise response

Pulse during rest periods, average and maximum heart rate, and estimated VO2max.

How participants felt

Questionnaires before, immediately after and one hour after exercise covered soreness, energy and wellbeing.

Study 119-004. Source: report, printed pages 13–15. A small pilot study involving 13 participants.

EXERCISE STRESS AND RECOVERY

What changed after exercise?

Blood measures

The report describes statistically significant differences in selected red-cell and inflammatory-cell measures after the drinking periods.

Lactate

The booklet reports a mild trend toward a faster return to normal plasma lactate.

Reported recovery

Questionnaires recorded differences in soreness, physical and mental energy, focus and overall wellbeing.

No significant difference

Average heart rate, maximum heart rate and estimated VO2max did not differ significantly between the two drinking conditions.

CYTOKINES

How immune cells send messages

Cytokines are signalling proteins. In later analysis of stored samples, IL-1ra, TNF-alpha and MCP-1 rose after exercise under both conditions, but the report says the increases were smaller and returned to baseline faster after alkaline ionized water. IL-8 and MIP-1 beta rose more strongly yet also returned faster. IL-1 beta, IL-6, IL-10, IFN-gamma and G-CSF were generally below detection.

Reported after exercise

IL-1ra · TNF-alpha · MCP-1

Smaller rise, faster return to baseline

IL-8 · MIP-1 beta

Larger rise, faster return to baseline

IL-1 beta · IL-6 · IL-10 · IFN-gamma · G-CSF

Generally below detection

First two rows: alkaline ionized water compared with tap water. Qualitative summary, not a chart of measured effect sizes.
Superoxide radicals
SODAn antioxidant enzyme
Less reactive molecules
A simplified explanation of SOD’s normal role in the body.

THE BODY'S ANTIOXIDANT DEFENCE

What the report observed about SOD

SOD is an enzyme that helps convert superoxide radicals into less reactive molecules. The report says the later stored-sample analysis found a marked SOD response, which Dr. Filtzer called “the most profound revelation of the study.”

THE MOST IMPORTANT FINDINGS

Six findings at a glance

Review all six findings
IN VITRO

Antioxidant activity

Direct antioxidant capacity was described as mild, real and reproducible. The separate cellular-protection test did not show protection above tap water under that protocol.

IN VITRO

Inflammatory-cell response

Inflammatory cells exposed to the test water produced fewer free radicals in the laboratory model.

IN VITRO

Cellular metabolism

Metabolic activity increased in PMN cells under one higher-glucose, four-hour condition. Results differed by cell type, glucose level and duration.

HUMAN STUDY

Blood-cell response

The report describes statistically significant differences in selected CBC measures, including red blood cells, haemoglobin, haematocrit and some inflammatory-cell counts after the drinking periods.

HUMAN STUDY

Recovery and wellbeing

Participants reported differences in soreness, energy and overall wellbeing. The report also notes only a mild trend toward faster lactate normalization, and no significant heart-rate or VO2max difference.

LATER SAMPLE ANALYSIS

Cytokines and SOD

Stored samples were later analysed for selected cytokines and superoxide dismutase. The booklet describes different cytokine response patterns and a marked SOD response.

WORDS FROM THE REPORT, IN CONTEXT

“Mild, but real and reproducible.”

Direct antioxidant capacity, Study 119-001

“the most profound revelation of the study”

Dr. Filtzer's interpretation of the later SOD observation

RESEARCH SCOPE & NEXT STEPS

What could these findings mean if further studies confirm them?

This Enagic-sponsored report brings together cell experiments and a crossover pilot involving 13 healthy adult men. It offers early findings. Larger, independent studies involving more varied participants and longer follow-up are needed to establish how consistent the effects are, how large they are and whether they matter in everyday life.

The later cytokine and SOD discussion provides limited numerical detail. More complete methods and results would help other researchers assess and repeat that work.

If those studies confirm the reported findings, three useful possibilities could follow:

A clearer role for drinking water in exercise recovery

Researchers could establish whether choosing a particular drinking water helps people feel less sore or recover better after exercise, and under what conditions. That could add a practical, everyday factor to the study of recovery.

A better understanding of the body’s responses

By connecting cell findings with blood measurements and people’s experiences, researchers could explore how the reported changes relate to each other. This could help explain which effects are meaningful for people.

More useful guidance for everyday choices

Stronger evidence could clarify who might benefit, how much difference to expect and over what period. People would then have clearer research to consider when choosing their drinking water.

That is the promise of continuing this research: turning an everyday choice into a better-understood part of wellbeing. These are questions for future studies, not benefits already established by this report.

This report does not prove that Kangen Water cures, prevents or treats disease, or that everyone will experience the same result.

WHO SHOULD READ THIS?

Existing Kangen Water users who want to understand the evidenceNew customers comparing alkaline ionized water with ordinary drinking waterWellness professionals reviewing the source and study designDistributors and partners who want to educate without making unsupported claims
Scientific Study Results report cover

THE PRIMARY REPORT

Scientific Study Results on the Benefits of Kangen Water in the Human Tissue Culture and Living Human Volunteers

H. S. Filtzer, MD, FACS · Medical Advisor, Enagic USA

KWH reviewed the complete 35-page project copy. The file contains a copyright notice, and part of the appended strategic plan states that it may not be distributed without written permission. We therefore do not publish an unrestricted download without documented rights. No verified official publisher or reputable current purchase listing was found.

Ask About the Research Report

SCIENTIFIC REFERENCES

Report and related scientific references

ENAGIC-SPONSORED PRIMARY REPORT

Filtzer HS. Scientific Study Results on the Benefits of Kangen Water in the Human Tissue Culture and Living Human Volunteers. 2017. Includes NIS Labs reports 119-001, 119-002 and 119-004, plus later commentary on cytokines and SOD.

RELATED SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE

These publications explore electrolyzed reduced water using different models, water systems and methods. The study type is listed with each reference.

  1. Shirahata S, et al. Electrolyzed-reduced water scavenges active oxygen species and protects DNA from oxidative damage.

    Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1997;234(1):269-274. PMID 9169001. DOI 10.1006/bbrc.1997.6622.

    In vitro biochemical and DNA model
  2. Kashiwagi T, et al. Electrochemically reduced water protects neural cells from oxidative damage.

    Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2014;2014:869121. PMID 25383141. DOI 10.1155/2014/869121.

    Rodent neuronal cell lines and primary cells
  3. Hamasaki T, et al. Electrochemically reduced water exerts superior reactive oxygen species scavenging activity in HT1080 cells.

    PLoS One. 2017;12(2):e0171192. PMID 28182635. DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0171192.

    In vitro human fibrosarcoma cell model; industry affiliation and funding disclosed
  4. Choi YA, et al. Outcomes Assessment of Sustainable and Innovatively Simple Lifestyle Modification at the Workplace - Drinking Electrolyzed-Reduced Water.

    Antioxidants (Basel). 2020;9(7):564. PMID 32605142. DOI 10.3390/antiox9070564.

    Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled human trial; ERW, not a Kangen-specific product trial
  5. Huang KC, et al. Electrolysed-reduced water dialysate improves T-cell damage in end-stage renal disease patients with chronic haemodialysis.

    Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010;25(8):2730-2737. PMID 20190245. DOI 10.1093/ndt/gfq082.

    Human haemodialysis study using ERW dialysate, not drinking water
Reading note

This article explains an Enagic-sponsored report for general education. The future possibilities discussed are research questions, not established product benefits. It is not medical advice.

By Kangen Wellness Hub Editorial

Last reviewed: 2026-10-08

More Insights →

LET'S TALK

Your Questions. Your Pace.

Start a Conversation ↗
WhatsApp ↗